Statement of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation on Focus Issues of the 8th Session of the United Nations Open-ended Working Group on Ageing

The International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation (ICERM) is committed to supporting sustainable peace in countries around the world, and we are well aware of the contributions that can be made by our elders. ICERM has established the World Elders Forum strictly for elders, traditional rulers/leaders or representatives of ethnic, religious, community and indigenous groups. We invite the contributions of those who have lived through astounding technological, political, and social changes. We need their help in reconciling these changes with customary laws and traditions. We seek their wisdom in settling disputes peacefully, preventing conflict, beginning dialogue, and encouraging other nonviolent methods of conflict resolution.

Yet, as we researched answers to the specific Guiding Questions for this session, it is disappointing to see that the United States, where our organization is based, has limited views on the human rights of older persons. We have civil and criminal laws to protect them from physical and financial abuse. We have laws to help them maintain some autonomy, even when they need guardians or others to speak for them on limited issues, such as health care or financial decisions. Yet we haven’t done much to challenge social norms, to maintain inclusion of ageing persons, or to reintegrate those who have become isolated.

First, we lump everyone over age 60 into one group, as if they are all the same. Can you imagine if we did that for everyone under age 30? A wealthy 80-year-old woman in Manhattan who has access to health care and modern medicine clearly has different needs than a 65-year-old man in agrarian Iowa. Just as we seek to identify, embrace, and reconcile the distinctions among people with different ethnic and religious backgrounds, ICERM works to bring elders and other marginalized people into the conversations that affect them. We haven’t forgotten that what affects us also affects them. It’s true that we might not be affected in the same ways, but each of us is affected uniquely, and each of our experiences is valid. We must take the time to look beyond age, as in some ways we are also discriminating on that basis and perpetuating the very problems we seek to resolve.

Second, in the US, we protect older persons from discrimination when they are still working, but there appears to be an acquiescence where access to goods and services, health care, and social care are concerned. We have our own prejudices against them when they are not “productive”. The Americans with Disabilities Act will protect them as their physical limitations decrease and they must navigate public spaces, but will they have adequate health care and social care? Too much depends on income, and more than one-third or our ageing population is living near the federal poverty level. The number of those with the same financial plan for their later years is only expected to increase, and at times when we are also preparing for worker shortages.

We are not convinced that additional legislation would change much of the discrimination we see against ageing persons, nor do we think it would be drafted consistent with our Constitution. As mediators and skilled facilitators, we see an opportunity for dialogue and creative problem-solving when we include the ageing populations. We still have a lot to learn about the many different people that comprise this large section of the world population. Perhaps this is the time for us to listen, observe, and collaborate.

Third, we need more programs that keep ageing persons connected with their communities. Where they have already become isolated, we need to re-integrate them through volunteering, mentoring, and other programs that remind them of their value and encourage their continuing contributions, not as punishment but as opportunity. We have programs for children, who are only going to remain children for 18 years. Where are the equivalent programs for 60- and 70-somethings who might also have 18 or more years to learn and grow, especially where the adults often have more knowledge and experience to share than the children during their 18 years? I do not mean to suggest the education of children has no value, but we are missing huge opportunities when we fail to empower older people, too.

As American Bar Association Liaison stated at the Sixth Session, “a convention on human rights for older persons must be about more than just compiling and specifying rights. It must also change the social paradigm of aging.” (Mock, 2015). The American Association for Retired Persons agrees, adding “By Disrupting Aging—changing the conversation about what it means to grow older—we can spark solutions and tap resources that evolve the workplace, expand the marketplace and remake our communities.” (Collett, 2017). We cannot do all of these effectively until we challenge our own implicit biases about aging, which we do through skilled facilitation.

Nance L. Schick, Esq., Main Representative of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation at the United Nations Headquarters, New York. 

Download Full Statement

Statement of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation on Focus Issues of the 8th Session of the United Nations Open-ended Working Group on Ageing (May 5, 2017).
Share

Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share