A Case of Ethno-Religious Identity

 

What Happened? Historical Background to the Conflict

A case of ethno-religious identity is a conflict between the head of a town and a priest of an Orthodox Church. Jamal is a respected Muslim, an ethnic Oromo, and the head of a small town in Oromia region of western Ethiopia. Daniel is an Orthodox Christian, an ethnic Amhara, and a well-respected priest of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church in the same town.

Since he assumed office in 2016, Jamal is known for his efforts for the development of the town. He collaborated with many people in the society to fundraise money and build a secondary school, which the town did not have before. He has been recognized for what he did in the health and service sectors. He is praised by many business men and women for facilitating microfinance services and subsidies for small-scale business owners in the town. Although he is considered as a champion of change, he is criticized by some for giving preferential treatment to his group members – ethnic Oromos and Muslims – in various administrative, social, and business-related projects.

Daniel has been serving the Ethiopian Orthodox Church for about thirty years. As he was born in the town, he is well known for his passion, tireless service and unconditional love for Christianity and the church. After becoming a priest in 2005, he dedicated his life to the service of his church, while encouraging young Orthodox Christians to work for their church. He is the most loved priest by the younger generation. He is further known for his fight for land rights of the church. He even opened a legal case asking the government to return plots of land owned by the church that was confiscated by the previous military regime.

These two well-known persons were involved in a conflict due to the plan of Jamal’s administration to build a business center in the location that, according to the priest and majority of the Orthodox Christians, historically belongs to the Orthodox Church and known for a place for the celebration of the epiphany. Jamal ordered his administration’s team to mark the area and the construction agents to start the construction of the business center. Priest Daniel made a call to fellow Orthodox Christians to protect their land and defend themselves against an attack on their religion in the name of development. Following the priest’s call, a group of young Orthodox Christians removed the signs and announced that the construction of the center should stop. They protested in front of the office of the head of the town, and the demonstration turned into violence. Due to the violent conflict that erupted between the protesters and the police, two young Orthodox Christians were killed. The federal government ordered that the construction plan should stop immediately, and called both Jamal and priest Daniel to the capital for further negotiation.

Each Other’s Stories — how each person understands the situation and why

Jamal’s Story – Priest Daniel and his young followers are obstacles to development

Position:

Priest Daniel should stop obstructing the town’s development effort. He should stop encouraging young orthodox Christians to engage in violent activities in the name of religious freedom and right. He should accept the administration’s decision and collaborate for the construction of the center. 

Interests:

Development: As the head of the town, I have the responsibility to develop the town. We do not have a single organized business center for proper operation of different business activities. Our market is very traditional, unorganized and inconvenient for business expansion. Our neighboring towns and cities have big business areas where buyers and sellers easily interact. We are losing potential business men and women as they are moving to big centers in neighboring towns. Our people are forced to depend on other towns for their shopping. The construction of organized business center will contribute to the growth of our town by attracting business men and women. 

Employment Opportunities: The construction of a business center will not only help business owners, but also create employment opportunities for our people. The plan is to build a big business center which will create job opportunities for hundreds of men and women. This will help our young generation. This is for all of us not for a specific group of people. Our aim is to develop our town; not to attack religion.

Using Available Resources: The selected land is not owned by any institution. It is the property of the government. We are just using available resources. We selected the area because it is a very convenient place for business. It has nothing to do with religious attack. We are not targeting any religion; we are just trying to develop our town with what we have. The claim that the place belongs to the church is not supported by any legal evidence. The church never owned a specified land; they don’t have document for it. Yes, they have been using the place for the celebration of the epiphany. They were practicing such religious activities in a government owned land. My administration or previous administrations had not protected this government property as we did not have any plan to use the specified land. Now, we have developed a plan to build a business center on government owned land. They can celebrate their epiphany in any available free spaces, and for the arrangement of that place we are ready to work with the church.

Priest Daniel’s Story – Jamal’s aim is to disempower the church, not to develop the town.

Position:

The plan is not for the benefit of the town as repeatedly stated by Jamal. It is an intentionally designed attack on our church and identity. As a responsible priest, I will not accept any attack on my church. I will never allow any construction; rather I would prefer to die fighting for my church. I will not stop calling believers to protect their church, their identity, and their property. It is not a simple issue that I can compromise on. It is rather a serious attack to destroy the historical right of the church.

Interests:

Historical Rights: We have been celebrating the epiphany at this location for centuries. Our ancestors blessed the area for the epiphany. They prayed for the blessing of water, purification of the place, and protection from any attacks. It is now our responsibility to protect our church and property. We have a historical right to the place. We know that Jamal is saying we do not have a legal paper, but thousands of people who have been celebrating the epiphany every year at this location are our legal witnesses. This land is our land! We will not allow any building in this place. Our interest is to preserve our historical right.

Religious and Ethnic Bias: We know that Jamal is helpful to Muslims, but not to us Christians. We certainly know that Jamal considered the Ethiopian Orthodox Church as a church that mainly serves the Amhara ethnic group. He is an Oromo working for the Oromos and he believes that the church has nothing to offer to him. Majority of Oromos in this area are not Orthodox Christians; they are either Protestants or Muslims and he believes that he can easily mobilize others against us. We Orthodox Christians are the minority in this town and our number is decreasing every year due to forced migration to other parts of the country. We know that they are forcing us to leave the place in the name of development. We will not leave; we will rather die here. We might be considered as minority in number, but we are majority with the blessing of our God. Our main interest is to be treated equally and to fight against religious and ethnic bias. We kindly ask Jamal to leave our property for us. We know that he helped Muslims build their mosque. He gave them land to construct their mosque, but here he is trying to take our land. He never consulted us regarding the plan. We consider this as a serious hatred toward our religion and existence. We will never give up; our hope is in God.

Mediation Project: Mediation Case Study developed by Abdurahman Omar, 2019

Share

Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share