Interfaith Cooperation: An Invitation for All Beliefs

Elizabeth Sink

Interfaith Cooperation: An Invitation for All Beliefs on ICERM Radio aired on Saturday, August 13, 2016 @ 2 PM Eastern Time (New York).

2016 Summer Lecture Series

Theme: Interfaith Cooperation: An Invitation for All Beliefs

Elizabeth Sink

Guest Lecturer: Elizabeth Sink, Department of Communication Studies, Colorado State University


This lecture focuses on one of those big things that we are told NEVER to talk about in polite conversation. No, even though it is an election year, the lecture isn’t about politics, or money. Elizabeth Sink talks about religion, specifically, interfaith cooperation. She starts by sharing her story and the personal stake she has in this work. Then, she shares how students on her campus at Colorado State University are bravely crossing faith and belief lines and changing the stories we most commonly hear about religion in US America.

Transcript of the Lecture

My subject today is one of those big things that we are told NEVER to talk about in polite conversation. No, even though it is an election year, I’m not going to focus on politics, or money. And even though it might be much more exciting, it’s not going to be sex either. Today, I’m going to talk about religion, specifically, interfaith cooperation. I’ll start by sharing my story and the personal stake I have in this work. Then, I’ll share how students on my campus at Colorado State University are bravely crossing faith and belief lines and changing the stories we most commonly hear about religion in US America.

In my life, I have occupied many, seemingly contradictory, religious identifications. In the most concise summary as possible: until the age of 8, I had no affiliation, I was swayed by some great donuts at my friend’s church. I quickly decided that church was my thing. I was drawn in by groups of people singing together, collective ritual, and genuinely trying to make the world a better place. I proceeded to become a devout Christian, then specifically, a Catholic. My entire social identity was rooted in my Christianity. I would go to church several times a week, help to start a high school youth group together with my peers, and helped our community in various service projects. Great stuff. But here is where my spiritual journey began to take a rather ugly turn.

For many years, I chose to adhere to a very fundamentalist practice. I soon began to pity non-Christians: negating their beliefs and in most cases attempting to outrightly convert them – to save them from themselves. Unfortunately, I was praised and rewarded for such behavior, (and I’m a first born child), so this only strengthened my resolve.  A few years later, during a youth ministry training trip, I underwent a very profound de-conversion experience, as I became aware of the narrow-minded and narrow-hearted person I had become. I felt wounded and confused, and following the great pendulum of life, I proceeded to blame religion for my hurt as well as every evil in the world.

Ten years after I had left religion, running and screaming, I found myself craving “church” again. This was a jagged little pill for me to swallow especially since I identified as an atheist. Talk about some cognitive dissonance! I found that I was seeking just the thing I had originally been drawn to at age 8 – an optimistic group of people looking to make the world a better place.

So thirty years after I ate my first church donut and traveling through a very complex spiritual journey so far – I currently identify as a Humanist. I affirm human responsibility to lead a meaningful and ethical life capable of adding to the greater good of humanity, without the assumption of a God. Essentially, this is the same as an atheist, but with a moral imperative thrown in.

And, believe it or not, I am a church-goer again, but “church” looks a bit different now. I have found a new spiritual home in a Unitarian Universalist Church, where I practice right beside a very elective group of folks who identify as “recovering religious,” Buddhists, atheists, born again Christians, Pagans, Jewish, agnostics, etc. We are not bonded by creed, but by values and action.

The reason I share my story with you is because spending time in all these different identities inspired me to begin an interfaith cooperation program at my university.

So that’s my story. There’s the lesson – Religion encapsulates humanities best and worst potentialities – and it is our relationships, and particularly our relationships across faith lines that statistically tilt the scales toward the positive. When compared to other industrialized nations, the US is one of the most religious – 60% of Americans say that their religion is very important to them. Many religious folks are genuinely invested in making the world a better place. In fact, half of America’s volunteerism and philanthropy is religiously based. Unfortunately, many of us have experienced religion as oppressive and abusive. Historically, religion has been used in horrendous ways to subjugate humans in all cultures.

What we see happening right now in the US is a shift and widening gap (particularly in politics) between those who consider themselves religious, and those who do not. Because of that, there is a tendency, to blame the other side, perpetuate stigmas about one another, and isolate ourselves from each other, which only exacerbates the divide. This is a snapshot of our current era and it is NOT a system that leads to a healthy future.

I’d now like to focus our attention, for a moment, on the “OTHER” side of that divide, and introduce you to the fastest growing religious demographic in America. This category is often referred to as “Spiritual-But-Not-Religious,  “unaffiliated,” or “None,” sort of a catchall term that incorporates, agnostics, atheists, humanists, spirituals, Pagans, and those who claim “nothing in particular.”  The “unaffiliated 1/5th of Americans, and 1/3rd of adults under 30, are religiously unaffiliated, the highest percentage ever noted in Pew Research history.

Currently, about 70% of US Americans identify as Christian, and I just mentioned about 20% identify as “unaffiliated.”  The other 10% includes those who identify as Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu and others. Stigmas exist between these categories, and they often keep us from believing we have anything in common with one another. I can speak to this personally. While preparing for this talk, where I would “religiously out” myself as a non-Christian, I came face to face with these stigmas.  I felt ashamed to have changed my allegiance, and now am counted among those whom I once objectified, pitied, and outright bullied. I felt fear that my family and community I grew up in will be disappointed in me and afraid that I will lose credibility among my more religious friends.  And in facing these feelings, I can see now how I always throw extra zeal into all my interfaith efforts, so that when/if you might find out about my identity, you’d kindly over look it, because of all the good work I do. (I’m a 1st born, can you tell)?

I didn’t mean for this talk to turn into me “religiously outing” myself. This vulnerability is frightening. Ironically, I have been a public speaking instructor for the past 12 years – I teach about reducing anxiety, and yet I am literally at a fight-or-flight level of scared right now.  But, these emotions emphasize how important this message is.

Wherever you find yourself on the spiritual spectrum, I challenge you to honor your own beliefs and realize your own bias, and most importantly – don’t your belief and bias keep you from stepping across faith lines and engaging. It is NOT in our best interest (individually or collectively) to STAY in this space of blame and isolation. Forming relationships with people of different beliefs, statistically, makes the most positive impact in healing conflict.

So let’s look at how we can begin to respectfully engage.

Essentially, interreligious / or interfaith cooperation relies on the principle of religious pluralism. A national organization called the Interfaith Youth Core, defines religious pluralism as:

  • Respect for people’s diverse religious and non-religious identities,
  • Mutually inspiring relationships between people of different backgrounds,
  • and Common action for the common good.

Interfaith cooperation is the practice of Religious pluralism. Adopting pluralistic mindsets allows for softening instead of hardening of perspectives. This work teaches us skills to move beyond mere tolerance, teaches us a new language, and with it we are able to change the repetitive stories we hear in the media, from conflict to cooperation.  I’m delighted to share the following interfaith success story, happening on my campus.

I am a college instructor in the field of Communication Studies, so I approached several departments at my public university, asking for support of an academic course about interfaith cooperation, finally, in the spring of 2015, our university’s living-learning communities accepted my offer.  I am delighted to report that two interfaith classes, which enrolled 25 students, were piloted last semester. Specifically, students in these classes, identified as Evangelical Christian, Cultural Catholic, “kinda” Mormon, Atheist, Agnostic, Muslim, and a few others. These are salt of the earth, do-gooders.

Together, we took field trips to Islamic and Jewish houses of worship. We learned from guest speakers who shared their struggles and joys. We fostered moments of much-needed understanding about traditions. For example, one class period, two of my great friends of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, came in and answered every single question posed to them by my eager group of 19 year olds. That doesn’t mean everyone left the room in agreement, it means we left the room with genuine understanding. And the world needs more of that.

Students considered tough questions like “Do all religions boil down to the same thing?”  (No!) and “How do we move forward when we’ve just realized that we can’t both be right?”

As a class, we also served. In cooperation with several other student faith-based groups, we pulled off a wildly-successful “Interfaith Thanksgiving” service. With the financial support of our local Fort Collins Interfaith Council and other organizations, students cooked a kosher, gluten-free Thanksgiving meal with vegan options for over 160 people.

At the end of the semester, students commented:

“…I never realized that there were a lot of atheist people, because I did not realize that atheist people looked just like me. For some odd reason, I thought an atheist person would look like a mad scientist.”

“I was surprised to actually be angry at my fellow classmates for some of the things that they believed in…This was something that spoke to me because I realized that I was more biased than I thought.”

“Interfaith taught me how to live on the bridge between different religions and not on the far side of one.”

In the end, the program is a success from the perspective of students and administration; and will continue, with hopes of expansion in the next few years.

I hope I’ve emphasized today, that contrary to popular belief, religion is a thing that we should talk about. When we begin to realize that people of EVERY belief are doing their best to live ethical and moral lives, THERE is where the story changes. We are better together.

I challenge you to make a new friend with a person with different spiritual beliefs than you and together, change the story. And don’t forget the donuts!

Elizabeth Sink hails from the Midwest, where she graduated in 1999 with a Bachelors degree in Interdisciplinary Communication Studies from Aquinas College, in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She completed her Masters Degree in Communication Studies at Colorado State University in 2006 and has been teaching there ever since.

Her current scholarship, teaching, program and curriculum development considers our current cultural/socio/political landscape and advances progressive means of communication between differing religious/non-religious people. She is interested in the ways civically-based higher education affects students’ motivation for involvement in their communities, perceptions regarding their own biased and/or polarized views, understanding self-efficacy, and critical thinking processes.


Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.


Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.


Hope for Solidarity: Perceptions of Hindu-Christian Relations among Indian Christians in North America

Incidents of anti-Christian violence have become more prevalent in India, alongside the growing influence of the Hindu nationalist movement and the Bharatiya Janata Party’s obtainment of power in the central government in May 2014. Many individuals, both within India and the diaspora, have engaged in transnational human rights activism directed at this and related issues. However, limited research has focused on the transnational activism of the Indian Christian community in the United States and Canada. This paper is one component of a qualitative study aimed at examining the responses of Indian Christians in diaspora to religious persecution, as well as participants’ understandings of the causes and potential solutions to intergroup conflict within the global Indian community. Particularly, this paper focuses on the intersectional complexity of borders and boundaries that exist between Indian Christians and Hindus in the diaspora. Analysis drawn from forty-seven in-depth interviews of individuals residing in the United States and Canada and participant observation of six events reveals that these translucent boundaries are bridged by participants’ memories and their positionality across transnational socio-spiritual fields. Despite existing tensions as evidenced by some personal experiences of discrimination and hostility, interviewees communicated an overarching hope for solidarity that could transcend communal conflicts and violence. More specifically, many participants recognized that the violation of Christians’ rights is not the only significant human rights issue, and they sought to ameliorate the suffering of others regardless of identity. Therefore, I argue that memories of communal harmony in the homeland, host country experiences, and mutual respect for religious salience catalyze hope for solidarity across interfaith boundaries. These points highlight the need for further research on the importance of ideologies and practices connected to religious faith as catalysts for solidarity and subsequent collective action in diverse national and cultural contexts.