The Phenomenon of Mass-mindedness

Basil Ugorji with the Clark Center Scholars Manhattanville College

Dr. Basil Ugorji with some Clark Center Scholars during their 1st Annual Interfaith Saturday Retreat Program held on September 24, 2022 at Manhattanville College, Purchase, New York. 

One of the major factors that often fuel ethno-religious conflicts in countries around the world may be attributed to the deadly phenomenon of mass-mindedness, blind belief and obedience. In many countries, some people have a pre-conceived idea that members of some ethnic or religious groups are simply their enemies. They think that nothing good will ever come out from them. These are the results of long accumulated grievances and prejudices. As we observe, such grievances always manifest in the form of distrust, stout intolerance and hatred. Also, there are some members of certain religious groups who, for no reason, would not like to associate, live, sit down or even shake hands with people from other religious groups. If those people are asked to explain why they behave that way, they may not have concrete reasons or explanation. They will simply tell you: “that is what we were taught”; “they are different from us”; “we do not have the same belief system”; “they speak a different language and have a different culture”.

Each time I listen to those comments, I feel completely disappointed. In them, one sees how the individual is subjected and doomed to the destructive influence of the society in which he or she lives.

Instead of subscribing to such beliefs, each person should look inwardly and ask: if my immediate society tells me that the other person is evil, inferior, or an enemy, what do I who am a rational being think? If people say negative things against others, on what grounds should I base my own judgments? Am I carried away by what people say, or do I accept and respect others as human beings like me, irrespective of their religious beliefs or ethnic backgrounds?

In his book titled, The Undiscovered Self: The Dilemma of the Individual in Modern Society, Carl Jung [i] asserts that “much of the individual life of people in society has been subjugated by the cultural trend towards mass-mindedness and collectivism.” Jung defines mass-mindedness as “the reduction of individuals to anonymous, like-thinking units of humanity, to be manipulated by propaganda and advertising into fulfilling whatever function is required of them by those in power.” The spirit of mass-mindedness can devalue and minimize the individual, ‘making him or her feel worthless even as humanity as a whole makes progress.’ A mass-man lacks self-reflection, is infantile in his behavior, “unreasonable, irresponsible, emotional, erratic and unreliable.” In the mass, the individual loses his or her value and becomes the victim of “-isms.” Showing no sense of responsibility for his actions, a mass-man finds it easy to commit appalling crimes without thinking, and grows increasingly dependent on society. This kind of attitude could lead to disastrous consequences and conflicts.

Why is mass-mindedness a catalyst for ethno-religious conflicts? This is because the society in which we live, the media, and some ethnic and religious groups present us with only one point-of-view, one way of thinking, and do not encourage serious questioning and open discussion. Other ways of thinking—or interpretations—are ignored or denigrated. Reason and evidence tend to be dismissed and blind belief and obedience encouraged. Thus, the art of questioning, which is central to the development of the critical faculty, is stunted. Other opinions, belief systems or ways of life that are contrary to what a group believes are aggressively and stoutly rejected. This kind of mentality is evident in our contemporary societies and has caused misunderstandings between different ethnic and religious groups.

The attitude of mass-mindedness needs to be replaced with the disposition of the mind to question, revise and understand why some beliefs should be held or abandoned. Individuals need to be actively involved and not just to passively follow and keep rules. They need to contribute or give for the general good, and not just consuming and expecting to be given more.

In order to change this kind of mentality, there is need to enlighten every mind. As Socrates will say that “the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being,” individuals need to re-examine themselves, listen to their inner voice, and be courageous enough to use their reason before they speak or act. According to Immanuel Kant, “Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! [dare to know] “Have courage to use your own understanding!” – that is the motto of enlightenment”[ii].

Resisting this mass mentality can only be done effectively by the person who understands his own individuality, says Carl Jung. He encourages an exploration of the ‘microcosm – a reflection of the great cosmos in miniature’. We need to clean up our own house, put it in order before we can go ahead to put others and the rest of the world in order, because “Nemo dat quod non habet”, “no one gives what he or she has not”. We also need to develop a listening attitude in order to listen more to the rhythm of our inner being or the voice of the soul, and talk less about others who do not share the same belief systems with us.

I see this Interfaith Saturday Retreat Program as an opportunity for self-reflection. Something that I once called the Voice of the Soul Workshop in a book I published in 2012. A retreat such as this is a golden opportunity for a transition from the attitude of mass-mindedness to reflective individuality, from passivity to activity, from discipleship to leadership, and from the attitude of receiving to that of giving. Through it, we are once again invited to search for and discover our potentials, the wealth of solutions and capabilities embedded within us, which are needed for the resolution of conflicts, peace and development in countries around the world. We are therefore invited to change our focus from the “externals”— what is out there— to the “internals”—what is going on inside us. The outcome of this practice is to achieve metanoiaa spontaneous attempt of the psyche to heal itself of unbearable conflict by melting down and then being reborn in a more adaptive form [iii].

In the midst of so many distractions and allurements, accusations and blames, poverty, suffering, vice, crime and violent conflicts in many countries around the globe, the Voice of the Soul Workshop which this retreat invites us to, offers a unique opportunity to discover the beauties and positive realities of nature that each person carries within him or her, and the power of the “soul-life” that gently speaks to us in silence. Therefore, I invite you to “go deeper into the inner sanctuary of your own being, away from all the rush and so-called allurements of the outer life, and in the silence to listen to the voice of the soul, to hear its pleadings, to know its power”[iv]. “If the mind is filled with high incentives, beautiful principles, royal, splendid, and uplifting efforts, the voice of the soul speaks and the evil and weaknesses born of the undeveloped and selfish side of our human nature cannot come in, so they will die out”[v].

The question that I want to leave you with is: What contribution should we make as citizens with rights, responsibilities and obligations (and not just the government, not even our ethnic or religious leaders or others who hold public offices)? In other words, what should we do to help make our world a better place?

A reflection on this type of question leads to an awareness and discovery of our inner richness, capabilities, talents, strength, purpose, longings and vision. Instead of waiting for the government to restore peace and unity, we will be inspired to begin to take the bull by its horns in order to work for forgiveness, reconciliation, peace and unity. By doing this, we learn to be responsible, courageous, and active, and spend less time talking about other people’s weaknesses. As Katherine Tingley puts it, “think for a moment of the creations of men of genius. If they had stopped and turned back in doubt at the time when the divine impulse touched them, we should have no grand music, no beautiful paintings, no inspired art, and no marvelous inventions. These splendid, uplifting, creative forces originally come from man’s divine nature. If we all lived in the consciousness and the conviction of our own great possibilities, we should realize that we are souls and that we too have divine privileges far beyond anything that we know of or even think of. Yet we throw these aside because they are not acceptable to our limited, personal selves. They do not fit in with our preconceived ideas. So we forget that we are a part of the divine scheme of life, that the meaning of life is sacred and holy, and we allow ourselves to drift back into the vortex of misunderstanding, misconception, doubt, unhappiness, and despair”[vi].

The Voice of the Soul Workshop will help us go beyond misunderstandings, accusations, blames, fighting, ethno-religious differences, and courageously stand up for forgiveness, reconciliation, peace, harmony, unity and development.

For further reading on this topic, see Ugorji, Basil (2012). From Cultural Justice to Inter-Ethnic Mediation: A Reflection on the Possibility of Ethno-Religious Mediation in Africa. Colorado: Outskirts Press.

References

[i] Carl Gustav Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist and the founder of analytical psychology, considered individuation, a psychological process of integrating the opposites including the conscious with the unconscious while still maintaining their relative autonomy, necessary for a person to become whole. For a detailed reading on the theory of Mass-mindedness, see   Jung, Carl (2006). The Undiscovered Self: The Problem of the Individual in Modern Society. New American Library. pp. 15–16 ; also read Jung, C. G. (1989a). Memories, Dreams, Reflections (Rev. ed., C. Winston & R. Winston, Trans.) (A. Jaffe, Ed.). New York: Random House, Inc.

[ii] Immanuel Kant, An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? Konigsberg in Prussia, 30 September 1784.

[iii] From the Greek μετάνοια, metanoia is a change of mind or heart. Read Carl Jung’s psychology, op cit.

[iv] Katherine Tingley, The Splendor of the Soul (Pasadena, California: Theosophical University Press), 1996, quotation taken from chapter one of the book, titled: “The Voice of the Soul”, available at: http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/splendor/spl-1a.htm. Katherine Tingley was leader of the Theosophical Society (then named the Universal Brotherhood and Theosophical Society) from 1896 to 1929, and is remembered particularly for her educational and social reform work centered at the Society’s international headquarters at Point Loma, California.

[v] Ibid.

[vi] Ibid.

Basil Ugorji with the Clark Center Scholars at Manhattanville College

Dr. Basil Ugorji with some Clark Center Scholars during their 1st Annual Interfaith Saturday Retreat Program held on September 24, 2022 at Manhattanville College, Purchase, New York. 

“The Phenomenon of Mass-mindedness,” A Talk by Basil Ugorji, Ph.D. at the Manhattanville College Sr. Mary T. Clark Center for Religion and Social Justice’s 1st Annual Interfaith Saturday Retreat Program held on Saturday, September 24th, 2022, 11am-1pm in East Room, Benziger Hall. 

Share

Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share