The Newly-Discovered Documents on the Armenian Genocide

Vera Sahakyan's Speech

Presentation on Exceptional Collection of Ottoman Documents of Matenadaran Regarding the Armenian Genocide by Vera Sahakyan, Ph.D. Student, Junior Researcher, ”Matenadaran” Mesrop Mashtots Institute of Ancient Manuscripts, Armenia, Yerevan.

Abstract

The Armenian Genocide of 1915-16 orchestrated by the Ottoman Empire has been long discussed regardless of the fact that it is still unrecognized by the Republic of Turkey. Although a denial of genocide is a path to committing new crimes by other state and non-state actors, the proofs and evidence that exist regarding the Armenian Genocide are being undermined. This article aims to examine new documents and evidence to reinforce the claim to recognize the events of 1915-16 as an act of genocide. The study examined Ottoman documents that were kept at Matenadaran’s archives and have never been examined previously. One of them is a unique evidence of a direct order to deport Armenians from their shelters and settle the Turkish refugees into Armenian houses. In this regard, other documents have been concurrently examined, proving that the organized displacement of Ottoman Armenians was meant to be a deliberate and planned genocide.

Introduction

It is an undeniable fact and a recorded history that in 1915-16 the Armenian people living in the Ottoman Empire were subjected to genocide. If the current government of Turkey rejects the crime committed more than a century ago, it becomes an accessory to the crime. When a person or a state is not able to accept the crime they committed, more developed states need to intervene. These are the states that place high emphasis on the violations of human rights and their prevention becomes a guarantee for peace. What happened in 1915-1916 in the Ottoman Turkey should be labeled as a crime of genocide subject to criminal liability, since it is in line with all the articles of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In fact, Raphael Lemkin drafted the definition of a term “genocide” considering crimes and violations committed by the Ottoman Turkey in 1915 (Auron, 2003, p. 9). Therefore, the mechanisms that promote the prevention of crimes committed against humanity, and their future occurrence as well as the peacebuilding processes must be achieved through condemnation of past crimes.       

The subject of study of this research is an Ottoman official document comprising three pages (f.3). The document is written by the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and was sent to the second department responsible for abandoned property as a report containing information about a three-month deportation (from May 25 to August 12) (f.3). It includes information on the general orders, organization of the exile of Armenians, process of the deportations, and the roads through which the Armenians were deported. Moreover, it contains information regarding the aim of these actions, responsibilities of officials during the deportations, means that the Ottoman Empire used to organize the exploitation of Armenian property, as well as details about the process of the Turkification of Armenians through distributing the Armenian children to Turkish families and converting them into Islamic religion (f.3)․

It is a unique piece, since it contains orders that had previously never been included in other documents. Particularly, it possesses information on the plan to settle Turkish people in Armenian houses who migrated as a result of the Balkan War. This is the first official document from the Ottoman Empire that formally states whatever we have known for more than a century. Here is one of those unique instructions:

12 May 331 (May 25, 1915), Cryptogram: Just after depopulation of Armenian [villages], the number of people and the names of the villages must be gradually informed. The depopulated Armenian places must be resettled by Muslim migrants, the groups of which are centered in Ankara and Konya. From Konya, they must be sent to Adana and Diarbekir (Tigranakert) and from Ankara to Sivas (Sebastia), Caesarea (Kayseri) and Mamuret-ul Aziz (Mezire, Harput). For that special purpose, the recruited migrants must be sent to the mentioned places. Just at the moment of receiving this command, the migrants from the above-mentioned districts must move by the mentioned ways and means. With this, we notify its realization. (f.3)

If we ask people who survived the genocide or read their memoirs (Svazlian, 1995), we will come up with many evidence that are written in the same way, such as they were pushing us, deporting, forcibly taking our children from us, stealing our daughters, giving our shelters to Muslim migrants. This is an evidence from a witness, a reality recorded in the memory which was transferred from generation to generation through talks as well as through genetic memory. These documents are the only official evidence regarding the Armenian Genocide. The other examined document from the Matenadaran is the cryptogram about Armenians’ replacement (dated 12th of May, 1915 and the 25th of May, 1915 in the Gregorian calendar).

Consequently, two important facts need to be taken into consideration. The Armenians had to leave just in two hours after promulgating the replacement law. Therefore, if the child was asleep he should be woken up, if the woman was giving birth she had to take the road and if a minor child was swimming in the river, the mother had to leave without waiting for her child․

According to this order, a specific place, camp or a direction was not specified while deporting Armenians. Some researchers point out that specific plan was not discovered while examining the documents related to the Armenian Genocide. However, a certain plan exists that contains information about the displacement of Armenians from one place to another as well as orders to provide them with food, accommodation, medication and other primary necessities while deporting them. For moving to place B it is needed X time, which is reasonable and human’s body is able to survive. There isn’t such a guide either. People were directly turned out of their houses, driven out disorderly, the directions of the roads were changed from time to time as they didn’t have any final destination. The other purpose was the people’s annihilation and death by chasing and tormenting. Parallel to the displacement, the Turkish government carried out registration with the aim of organizational measure, so that just after the Armenians’ deportation the migrants’ resettlement committee “iskan ve asayiş müdüriyeti” would easily be able to resettle the Turkish migrants.

Concerning the minors, who were obligated to become Turkified, it should be mentioned that they were not allowed to leave with their parents. There were tens of thousands of Armenian orphans who were crying in the empty parents’ houses and under mental stress (Svazlian, 1995).

Regarding the Armenian children, Matenadaran collection has a Cryptogram (29 June, 331 which is July 12, 1915, Cryptogram-telegram (şifre)). “It is possible that some children might remain alive on the way to the deportation and exile. For the purpose of teaching and educating them, they must be distributed to such towns and villages which are financially secure, among families of well-known people where Armenians don’t live….” (f.3).

From an Ottoman archive document (dated September 17, 1915) we found out that from the center of Ankara 733 (seven hundred and thirty three) Armenian women and children were deported to Eskişehir, from Kalecik 257, and from Keskin 1,169 (DH.EUM. 2. Şb)․ This means that the children of these families became completely orphaned. For such places as Kalecik and Keskin, which have a very small area, 1,426 children are too much. According to the same document, we found out that the mentioned children were distributed to Islamic organizations (DH.EUM. 2. Şb)․ We should state that the mentioned document includes information regarding the children aged under five considering that the Turkification plan of Armenian children was drafted for children under the age of five (Raymond, 2011)․ The logic behind this plan was the concern that the children older than five will remember the details of the crime in the future. Thus, the Armenians were childless, homeless, with mental and physical suffering. This is to be condemned as a crime against humanity. To prove these latest revelations, on this occasion we quote from a single wire of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, again from the collection of the Matenadaran.

15 July 1915 (1915 July 28). Official letter: “From the very beginning in the Ottoman Empire Muslim-inhabited villages were small and backward because of being far from civilization. This contradicts to our principal position according to which the number of Muslims must be multiplied and increased. The skills of merchants as well as craftsmanship must be developed. Therefore, it is necessary to resettle the depopulated Armenian villages with the inhabitants having, which formerly had from one hundred to one hundred fifty houses. Apply immediately: After their settlement, the villages will still remain empty to register so that subsequently they also would be resettled with Muslim migrants and tribes (f.3).

So what kind of system existed for the implementation of the above-mentioned paragraph? There used to be a special institution in the Ottoman Empire titled “Deportation and Resettlement Directorate.” During the Genocide, the organization had cooperated with the commission of the ownerless property. It had implemented the registration of the Armenian houses and made the corresponding lists. So here is the main reason of the Armenians’ deportation as a result of which a whole nation was destroyed in the deserts. Thus, the first example of deportation is dated April 1915 and the latest document, at hand, is dated October 22, 1915. Finally, when was the beginning or the end of the deportation or what was the endpoint?

There is no clarity. Only one fact is known that people were continually driven, changing their directions, quantity of groups and even group members: young girls separately, adults, children, children under five years, each group separately. And on the way, they were constantly forced to convert.

A secret order signed by Talyat Pasha, dated October 22, was sent to 26 provinces with the following information: “Talyat orders if there are any cases of conversion after being deported, if their applications are approved from the headquarters, their displacement should be voided and if their possession is already given to another migrant it should be returned to the original owner. The conversion of such people is acceptable” (DH. ŞFR, 1915).

So, this shows that the state’s confiscation mechanisms of Armenian citizens in the Ottoman Empire were worked out earlier than Turkey would be drawn into the war. Such actions against the Armenian citizens were a proof of trampling the country’s basic law as enunciated in the Constitution. In this case, the original documents of the Ottoman Empire can be unquestionable and authentic proofs for the process of rehabilitation of the trampled rights of Armenian genocide victims.

Conclusion

The newly-discovered documents are reliable proofs regarding the details of the Armenian Genocide. They include orders by the highest state officials of the Ottoman Empire to deport Armenians, confiscate their property, convert Armenian children into Islam, and finally annihilate them. They are the evidence that the plan of committing the genocide was organized long before the Ottoman Empire engaged in the First World War. It was an official plan drafted on a state level to annihilate the Armenian people, destroy their historical homeland and confiscate their property. Developed states should support the condemnation of the denial of any genocidal acts. Therefore, with the publication of this report, I would like to have the attention of specialists in the field of international law to promote genocide condemnation and world peace.

The most effective means of preventing genocides is the punishment of the genocidal states. In honor of the memory of genocide victims, I call for the condemnation of discrimination against people regardless of their ethnic, national, religious and gender identities.

No genocides, no wars․

References

Auron, Y. (2003). The banality of denial. New York: Transaction Publishers.

DH.EUM. 2. Şb. (n.d.).  

DH. ŞFR, 5. (1915). Başbakanlık Osmanlı arşivi, DH. ŞFR, 57/281.

f.3, d. 1. (n.d.). Arabic script documents, f.3, doc 133.

General Directorate of State Archives. (n.d.). DH. EUM. 2. Şb.

Kévorkian R. (2011). The Armenian genocide: A complete history. New York: I. B. Tauris.

Matenadaran, Unprinted Catalogue of Persish, Arabish, Turkish Manuscripts. (n.d.). 1-23.

Şb, D. 2. (1915). General Directorate of State Archives (T. C. Başbakanlik Devlet Arşivleri

Genel Müdürlüğü), DH.EUM. 2. Şb.

Svazlian, V. (1995). The great genocide: Oral evidences of the western Armenians. Yerevan:

Gitutiun Publishing House of the NAS RA.

Takvi-i Vakayi. (1915, 06 01).

Takvim-i vakai. (1915, 06 01).

Share

Related Articles

Building Resilient Communities: Child-Focused Accountability Mechanisms for Yazidi Community Post-Genocide (2014)

This study focuses on two avenues through which accountability mechanisms can be pursued in the Yazidi community post-genocide era: judicial and non-judicial. Transitional justice is a unique post-crisis opportunity to support the transition of a community and foster a sense of resilience and hope through a strategic, multidimensional support. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach in these types of processes, and this paper takes into account a variety of essential factors in establishing the groundwork for an effective approach to not only hold Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) members accountable for their crimes against humanity, but to empower Yazidi members, specifically children, to regain a sense of autonomy and safety. In doing so, researchers lay out the international standards of children’s human rights obligations, specifying which are relevant in the Iraqi and Kurdish contexts. Then, by analyzing lessons learned from case studies of similar scenarios in Sierra Leone and Liberia, the study recommends interdisciplinary accountability mechanisms that are centered around encouraging child participation and protection within the Yazidi context. Specific avenues through which children can and should participate are provided. Interviews in Iraqi Kurdistan with seven child survivors of ISIL captivity allowed for firsthand accounts to inform the current gaps in tending to their post-captivity needs, and led to the creation of ISIL militant profiles, linking alleged culprits to specific violations of international law. These testimonials give unique insight into the young Yazidi survivor experience, and when analyzed in the broader religious, community and regional contexts, provide clarity in holistic next steps. Researchers hope to convey a sense of urgency in establishing effective transitional justice mechanisms for the Yazidi community, and call upon specific actors, as well as the international community to harness universal jurisdiction and promote the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as a non-punitive manner through which to honor Yazidis’ experiences, all while honoring the experience of the child.

Share

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share