Healing 25 Years After Waco: The Meeting of a Child Survivor of Waco with an FBI Agent who was Present during the Siege

What Happened? Historical Background to the Conflict

The Branch Davidians are a religious group that originated in 1955, who eventually settled at a Ranch just outside of Waco, Texas. Based on information the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) received that the group was stockpiling illegal weapons and ammunition, they obtained a search warrant for the compound, called Mount Carmel Center, and obtained arrest warrants for their leader, David Koresh, and a few other Davidians.

On February 28, 1993, when the ATF raided Mount Carmel, four federal agents, and six Branch Davidians were killed in intense gun fighting. The FBI took over, and for the next 51 days, a siege ensued, with 25 different FBI agents brought in to negotiate with the Davidians to get them to surrender. During that time, some children were sent out from the compound.

On April 19, 1993, the FBI attacked the compound with tear gas and a fire broke out, killing 76 people, including David Koresh. The people who had been released prior to the fire, and some who ran out during the fire, survived.

Each Other’s Stories – how each person understands the situation and why

Child Survivor of the Branch Davidians – 25 Years Later

Position:

The FBI killed my parents and my community. We had every right to be living together, studying the bible, under our wise and esteemed leader, David Koresh. Nobody had any right to bother, divide or kill us.

Interests:

Safety/Security: We felt it was our right to be left alone to study the bible and follow our leader. We felt safe with him and believed in what he told us, including during the siege. We wanted to be safe and were willing to do whatever our leader told us.

Physiological Needs: During the siege, the FBI, over time, took away what we needed for our comfort and livability. They cut our phone lines and electricity, in trying to get us to surrender. We still kept going because we were determined and knew we were in the right.

Belongingness/We/Team Spirit: We felt connected to our leader and each other. We only did what he told us to do, both before and during the siege, because we believed he knew what was right, and that he was a prophet.

Self-Esteem/Respect: We wanted to be respected, to follow our path and our leader, without interference from the outside world.

Self-Actualization: We were faithful to Koresh and believed in what he told us about the bible, ourselves, and the world. Those of us who survived have had a lot to figure out over the years. We lost so much.

The FBI Agent – 25 Years after the Siege

Position:

This cult was dangerous due to the weapons and ammunition they had amassed. David Koresh was crazy, his followers were brainwashed and they had weapons that were a danger to society. We didn’t want anyone to die. We just wanted to get them to surrender.

Interests:

Safety/Security: We wanted to end this as quickly as possible before it got violent. We wanted the people inside the compound to turn themselves in so that nobody would get hurt during this siege. We wanted the surrounding community to be safe, without the potential threat of weapons.

Physiological Needs: We wanted our agents to be safe and the Davidians to be safe. We realized we had to reduce their physiological needs to get them to surrender; so we cut the phone lines and electricity.

Belongingness/Family Values: We heard that David Koresh was sleeping with the wives of other men, and having babies with them. We also heard that there was child abuse going on. All of this was against our values, but the main point was the weapons.

Self-Esteem/Respect: We tried to respect David Koresh’s wishes, determined during negotiations, but even when we did, he still didn’t surrender. We had great negotiators working with him who tried many different angles to reach him.

Self-Actualization: It was our job, as FBI agents, to do our best to end the siege without any more people being harmed. It meant a lot to us to find a way that we could reach and impact Koresh, and the others, so they would surrender. We still suffer knowing how it ended and how many died.

Mediation Project: Mediation Case Study developed by Viki Assegued, 2018

Share

Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Building Resilient Communities: Child-Focused Accountability Mechanisms for Yazidi Community Post-Genocide (2014)

This study focuses on two avenues through which accountability mechanisms can be pursued in the Yazidi community post-genocide era: judicial and non-judicial. Transitional justice is a unique post-crisis opportunity to support the transition of a community and foster a sense of resilience and hope through a strategic, multidimensional support. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach in these types of processes, and this paper takes into account a variety of essential factors in establishing the groundwork for an effective approach to not only hold Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) members accountable for their crimes against humanity, but to empower Yazidi members, specifically children, to regain a sense of autonomy and safety. In doing so, researchers lay out the international standards of children’s human rights obligations, specifying which are relevant in the Iraqi and Kurdish contexts. Then, by analyzing lessons learned from case studies of similar scenarios in Sierra Leone and Liberia, the study recommends interdisciplinary accountability mechanisms that are centered around encouraging child participation and protection within the Yazidi context. Specific avenues through which children can and should participate are provided. Interviews in Iraqi Kurdistan with seven child survivors of ISIL captivity allowed for firsthand accounts to inform the current gaps in tending to their post-captivity needs, and led to the creation of ISIL militant profiles, linking alleged culprits to specific violations of international law. These testimonials give unique insight into the young Yazidi survivor experience, and when analyzed in the broader religious, community and regional contexts, provide clarity in holistic next steps. Researchers hope to convey a sense of urgency in establishing effective transitional justice mechanisms for the Yazidi community, and call upon specific actors, as well as the international community to harness universal jurisdiction and promote the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as a non-punitive manner through which to honor Yazidis’ experiences, all while honoring the experience of the child.

Share