Run to Nigeria with Olive Branch Talking Points

Talking Points: Our Position, Interests, and Needs

We the Nigerian people and friends of Nigeria all over the world, we have the obligation to contribute to peace, security and development in Nigeria, especially at this critical time in Nigerian history.

At the end of the Nigeria-Biafra war in 1970 – a war that left millions of people dead and caused irreparable damages – our parents and grandparents from all sides unanimously said: “never again shall we spill the blood of the innocent because of our inability to resolve our differences.”

Unfortunately, 50 years after the end of the war, some Nigerians of Biafran origin born after the war have revived the same agitation for secession – the same issue that led to the civil war in 1967.

In response to this agitation, a coalition of northern groups gave an eviction notice that enjoins all Igbos residing in all the northern states of Nigeria to leave the north and asks that all Hausa-Fulani in the eastern states of Nigeria should return to the north.

In addition to these socio-political conflicts, the Niger Delta issues have not yet been resolved.

Against this background, Nigerian leaders and interest groups are currently struggling to answer two important questions:

Is the dissolution of Nigeria or the independence of each ethnic nationality the answer to Nigeria’s problems? Or does the solution lie in creating the conditions that will help to address the issues of injustice and inequality through policy changes, policy formulations, and policy implementation?

As ordinary Nigerians whose parents and family witnessed first-hand and suffered the devastating effects of ethnic and religious conflict during and after the interethnic violence that culminated in the Nigeria-Biafra war in 1967, we have resolved to Run to Nigeria with an Olive Branch to create a psychological space for Nigerians to pause for a moment and think about better ways to live together in peace and harmony irrespective of ethnic and religious differences.

We have wasted so much time, human resources, money, and talents because of instability, violence, ethnic and religious hatred and bigotry coupled with corruption and bad leadership.

Because of all these, Nigeria has suffered brain drain. It has become difficult for young people from the north, south, east and west to achieve their God given potentials and pursue happiness in the land of their birth. The reason is not because we are not intelligent. Nigerians are among the brightest and intelligent people on earth. It is neither because of ethnicity nor religion.

It is simply because of selfish leaders and emerging power-hungry individuals who manipulate ethnicity and religion and use these identities to cause confusion, conflict and violence in Nigeria. These leaders and individuals take pleasure in seeing the ordinary citizens suffer. They make millions of dollars from violence and from our misery. Some of their children and spouses are living abroad.

We the people, we are tired of all these deceptions. What an ordinary Hausa-Fulani person in the north is passing through right now is the same with what an ordinary Igbo person in the east is going through, and the same applies to the hardship of an ordinary Yoruba person in the west, or the ordinary Niger Delta person, and citizens from other ethnic groups.

We the people, we cannot continue to allow them to use us, confuse us, manipulate us, and deflect the cause of the problem. We ask for policy changes to give all Nigerians the opportunity to pursue happiness and prosperity in the land of their birth. We need constant electricity, good education, and jobs. We need more opportunities for technological and scientific innovations and inventions.

We need a diversified economy. We need clean water and clean environment. We need good roads and housing. We need a conducive and respectful environment where we can all live to develop our God given potentials and pursue happiness and prosperity in the land of our birth. We want equal participation in the political and democratic processes at the local, state and federal levels. We want equal and just opportunities for all, in all sectors. Just as the Americans, the French or the British are treated with respect by their governments, we the citizens of Nigeria, we want our government and government agencies and institutions both home and abroad (including the Nigerian consulates abroad) to treat us with respect and dignity. We need to be comfortable staying and living in our country. And Nigerians in the diaspora need to be comfortable and happy visiting the Nigerian consulates in their countries of residence.

As concerned Nigerians and friends of Nigeria, we are going to Run to Nigeria with an Olive Branch beginning from September 5, 2017. We therefore invite fellow Nigerians and friends of Nigeria all over the world to run with us to Nigeria with an olive branch.

For the run to Nigeria with an olive branch campaign, we have chosen the following symbols.

The Dove: The Dove represents all those who will run in Abuja and the 36 states in Nigeria.

The Olive Branch: The Olive Branch represents the peace we are going to bring to Nigeria.

The White T-shirt: The White T-shirt represents the innocence and purity of ordinary Nigerian citizens, and the human and natural resources that need to be developed.

The light must prevail over darkness; and the good will surely defeat evil.

Symbolically and strategically, we are going to run to Nigeria with an olive branch from September 5, 2017 for peace and security to be restored in Nigeria. Love is better than hatred. Unity in diversity is more productive than division. We are stronger when we collaboratively work together as a nation.

May God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria;

May God bless the Nigerian people of all ethnic groups, faiths and political ideologies; and

May God bless all those who will run with us to Nigeria with an Olive Branch.

Share

Related Articles

Religions in Igboland: Diversification, Relevance and Belonging

Religion is one of the socioeconomic phenomena with undeniable impacts on humanity anywhere in the world. As sacrosanct as it seems, religion is not only important to the understanding of the existence of any indigenous population but also has policy relevance in the interethnic and developmental contexts. Historical and ethnographic evidence on different manifestations and nomenclatures of the phenomenon of religion abound. The Igbo nation in Southern Nigeria, on both sides of the Niger River, is one of the largest black entrepreneurial cultural groups in Africa, with unmistakable religious fervour that implicates sustainable development and interethnic interactions within its traditional borders. But the religious landscape of Igboland is constantly changing. Until 1840, the dominant religion(s) of the Igbo was indigenous or traditional. Less than two decades later, when Christian missionary activity commenced in the area, a new force was unleashed that would eventually reconfigure the indigenous religious landscape of the area. Christianity grew to dwarf the dominance of the latter. Before the centenary of Christianity in Igboland, Islam and other less hegemonic faiths arose to compete against indigenous Igbo religions and Christianity. This paper tracks the religious diversification and its functional relevance to harmonious development in Igboland. It draws its data from published works, interviews, and artefacts. It argues that as new religions emerge, the Igbo religious landscape will continue to diversify and/or adapt, either for inclusivity or exclusivity among the existing and emerging religions, for the survival of the Igbo.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share