Statement of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation to the 63rd Session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women

Not surprisingly, the United States is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (“CEDAW”). Women in the US are still at greater risk than men of:

  1. Homelessness due to domestic violence
  2. Poverty
  3. Employment in low-wage jobs
  4. Unpaid caregiving work
  5. Sexual violence
  6. Limitations on reproductive rights
  7. Sexual harassment at work

Homelessness Due to Domestic Violence

Although US men are more likely than US women to be homeless, one in four homeless women in the US are without shelter due to domestic violence. Families led by single mothers of minority races and with at least two children are especially vulnerable to homelessness, due to ethnicity, youth, and lack of financial and social resources.

Poverty

Women remain at greater risk of poverty—even in one of the wealthiest countries in the world—due to violence, discrimination, wage disparity, and higher employment in low-wage jobs or participation in unpaid caregiving work. As noted above minority women are especially vulnerable. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, Black women are earning 64% of salaries earned by white men, and Hispanic women are earning 54%.

Employment in Low-Wage Jobs

Although the Equal Pay Act of 1963 has helped decrease the wage gap between men and women in the US from 62% in 1979 to 80% in 2004, the Institute for Women’s Policy Research indicates we are not expecting wage parity—for white women—until 2058. There are no clear projections for minority women.

Unpaid Caregiving Work

According to the World Bank Group’s Women, Business and the Law 2018 report, only seven of the world’s economies fail to provide any paid maternity leave. The United States is one of them. States, such as New York, provide Paid Family Leave that can be used by men and women, but NY is still in the minority of states providing such paid leave. This leaves many women vulnerable to financial abuse, as well as physical, emotional, and sexual abuse.

Sexual Violence

One third of US women have been victims of sexual violence. Women in the US military are more likely to be raped by follow male soldiers than killed in combat.

More than four million have experienced sexual violence from an intimate partner, yet Missouri still allows statutory rapists and sexual predators to avoid conviction if they marry their victims. Florida only modified its similar law earlier in March 2018, and Arkansas passed a law last year that allows rapists to sue their victims, if the victims wish to abort pregnancies that resulted from these crimes.

Limitations on Reproductive Rights

Statistics published by the Guttmacher Institute indicates nearly 60% of women who seek abortions are already mothers. The United Nations Committee Against Torture recognizes the need for contraception and safe abortion to protect a woman’s human rights, yet the US continues to cut programs worldwide that offer women similar reproductive freedom to that enjoyed by men.

Sexual Harassment

Women are also at greater risk of sexual harassment in the workplace. In the US, sexual harassment is not a crime and is only occasionally punished civilly. Only when harassment becomes assault does there appear to be action taken. Even then, our system stills tend to put the victim on trial and protect the perpetrators. Recent cases involving Brock Turner and Harvey Weinstein have left US women seeking “safe spaces” free from men, which will probably only limit economic opportunities more—and possibly subject them to discrimination claims.

Looking Ahead

The International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation (ICERM) is committed to supporting sustainable peace in countries around the world, and that will not occur without women. We cannot build sustainable peace in communities where 50% of the population is excluded from Top-Level and Middle-Range leadership positions that influence policy (see Goals 4, 8 & 10). As such, ICERM provides training and certification in Ethno-Religious Mediation to prepare women (and men) for such leadership, and we look forward to facilitating partnerships that build strong peacemaking institutions (see Goals 4, 5, 16 & 17). Understanding that different member states have varying immediate needs, we seek to open dialogue and collaboration among affected parties at all levels, so that appropriate action can be taken cautiously and respectfully. We still believe we can live in peace and harmony, when guided skillfully to respect each other’s humanity. In dialogue, such as mediation, we can co-create solutions that might not have been apparent before.

Nance L. Schick, Esq., Main Representative of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation at the United Nations Headquarters, New York. 

Download Full Statement

Statement of International Center for Ethno-Religious Mediation to the 63rd Session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (11 to 22 March 2019).
Share

Related Articles

Building Resilient Communities: Child-Focused Accountability Mechanisms for Yazidi Community Post-Genocide (2014)

This study focuses on two avenues through which accountability mechanisms can be pursued in the Yazidi community post-genocide era: judicial and non-judicial. Transitional justice is a unique post-crisis opportunity to support the transition of a community and foster a sense of resilience and hope through a strategic, multidimensional support. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach in these types of processes, and this paper takes into account a variety of essential factors in establishing the groundwork for an effective approach to not only hold Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) members accountable for their crimes against humanity, but to empower Yazidi members, specifically children, to regain a sense of autonomy and safety. In doing so, researchers lay out the international standards of children’s human rights obligations, specifying which are relevant in the Iraqi and Kurdish contexts. Then, by analyzing lessons learned from case studies of similar scenarios in Sierra Leone and Liberia, the study recommends interdisciplinary accountability mechanisms that are centered around encouraging child participation and protection within the Yazidi context. Specific avenues through which children can and should participate are provided. Interviews in Iraqi Kurdistan with seven child survivors of ISIL captivity allowed for firsthand accounts to inform the current gaps in tending to their post-captivity needs, and led to the creation of ISIL militant profiles, linking alleged culprits to specific violations of international law. These testimonials give unique insight into the young Yazidi survivor experience, and when analyzed in the broader religious, community and regional contexts, provide clarity in holistic next steps. Researchers hope to convey a sense of urgency in establishing effective transitional justice mechanisms for the Yazidi community, and call upon specific actors, as well as the international community to harness universal jurisdiction and promote the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as a non-punitive manner through which to honor Yazidis’ experiences, all while honoring the experience of the child.

Share

Conversion to Islam and Ethnic Nationalism in Malaysia

This paper is a segment of a larger research project that focuses on the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism and supremacy in Malaysia. While the rise of ethnic Malay nationalism can be attributed to various factors, this paper specifically focuses on the Islamic conversion law in Malaysia and whether or not it has reinforced the sentiment of ethnic Malay supremacy. Malaysia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country which gained its independence in 1957 from the British. The Malays being the largest ethnic group have always regarded the religion of Islam as part and parcel of their identity which separates them from other ethnic groups that were brought into the country during British colonial rule. While Islam is the official religion, the Constitution allows other religions to be practiced peacefully by non-Malay Malaysians, namely the ethnic Chinese and Indians. However, the Islamic law that governs Muslim marriages in Malaysia has mandated that non-Muslims must convert to Islam should they wish to marry Muslims. In this paper, I argue that the Islamic conversion law has been used as a tool to strengthen the sentiment of ethnic Malay nationalism in Malaysia. Preliminary data were collected based on interviews with Malay Muslims who are married to non-Malays. The results have shown that majority of Malay interviewees consider conversion to Islam as imperative as required by the Islamic religion and the state law. In addition, they also see no reason why non-Malays would object to converting to Islam, as upon marriage, the children will automatically be considered Malays as per the Constitution, which also comes with status and privileges. Views of non-Malays who have converted to Islam were based on secondary interviews that have been conducted by other scholars. As being a Muslim is associated with being a Malay, many non-Malays that converted feel robbed of their sense of religious and ethnic identity, and feel pressured to embrace the ethnic Malay culture. While changing the conversion law might be difficult, open interfaith dialogues in schools and in public sectors might be the first step to tackle this problem.

Share